Question A.4, 2019 Labor Law Bar Exam

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Lawyer, Author, Mentor

A.4.

(Question A.4, Labor Law, 2019 Bar Exam)

Mrs. B, the personal cook in the household of X, filed a monetary claim against her employer, X, for denying her service incentive leave pay. X argued that Mrs. B did not avail of any service incentive leave at the end of her one (1) year of service and hence, not entitled to the said monetary claim.

(a) Is the contention of X tenable? Explain. (2.5%)

(b) Assuming that Mrs. B is instead a clerk in X’s company with at least 30 regular employees, will her monetary claim prosper? Explain (2.5%)

Suggested Answer:

(a) No. Answer

Under the Kasambahay Law, and its implementing rules and regulations, a kasambahay who has rendered at least one (1) year of service shall be entitled to an annual service incentive leave of at least five (5) days with pay. Rule

In the case at bar, Mrs. B has rendered at least one (1) year of service and thus entitling her to the 5-day service incentive leave. Apply

Thus, the contextion of X is not tenable. Conclusion

(b) Yes. Answer

Under the Labor Code, covered employees are entitled to a 5-day service incentive leave after rendering at least one (1) year of service. Rule

In the case at bar, if Mrs. B was a clerk in Company X, she would be a covered employee. Since she has rendered at least one (1) year of service, she would be entitled to the 5-day service incentive leave. Apply

Thus, the monetary claim of Mrs. B will prosper. Conclusion

..

(Notice: The suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide, and thus specific citations are not provided. Notwithstanding, in the reviewers, the bar exam question is answered under the appropriate topic which discusses the concepts and principles, as well as provide for specific citations. Accordingly, please refer to it on the reviewer or in the Library.)

Share:

WhatsApp
Telegram
Facebook
Twitter
Subjects

Political Law, Labor Law

P. Right against self-incrimination

The right against self-incrimination is accorded to every person who gives evidence, whether voluntary or under compulsion of subpoena, in any civil, criminal or administrative

F. Freedom of religion

Frequency: ★★★☆☆ 1. Non-establishment and free exercise clauses Non-establishment and free exercise clauses. No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting

Question 15, 2018 Labor Law Bar Exam

XV. (Question XV, Labor Law, 2018 Bar Exam) Nexturn Corporation employed Nini and Nono, whose tasks involved directing and supervising rank-and-file employees engaged in company

C. Arrests, Searches, and Seizures

Frequency: ★★☆☆☆ 1. Requisites of a valid warrant Requisites of a valid warrant: A search warrant shall not issue except: 1) Upon probable cause; 2)

G. Appropriation and re-alignment

Frequency: ★★★☆☆ 1. No transferring of appropriations – with exception GENERAL RULE: No law shall be passed authorizing any transfer of appropriations. (Section 25[5], Article

I. Crimes against property

Frequency: ★★★★★ CHAPTER 1: ROBBERY IN GENERAL ELEMENTS – ROBBERY IN GENERAL: 1) There is taking of personal property; 2) The personal property belongs to

D. Crimes against public interest

Frequency: ★★★☆☆ CHAPTER 1: FORGERIES SECTION 1 – FORGING THE SEAL OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISILANDS, THE SIGNATURE OR STAMP OF THE CHIEF

F. Crimes committed by public officers

Frequency: ★★★★★ CHAPTER 1: PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS a. CONCEPT OF PUBLIC OFFICERS PUBLIC OFFICERS: For the purpose of applying the provisions of this and the preceding

J. Parental authority

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Scope and extent of parental authority. Pursuant to the natural right and duty of parents over the person and property of their

Question 5, 2018 Civil Law Bar Exam

V (Question V, Civil Law, 2018 Bar Exam) Sol Soldivino, widow, passed away, leaving two (2) legitimate children: a 25-year-old son, Santino (whom she had

error: Content is protected.