Question A.2, 2019 Civil Law Bar Exam

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Lawyer, Author, Mentor


(Question A.2, Civil Law, 2019 Bar Exam)

H and W were married in 1990. H, being a member of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), was deployed to a rebel-infested area in 1992. Since then, W has not heard from her husband, H.

One day, the AFP informed W that H had been declared missing since 1995. In consequence, W diligently pursued all available means to ascertain her husband’s whereabouts, but to no avail.

Firmly believing that H had already died, W filed a claim before the AFP in 2008 for the death benefits of the missing serviceman. However, the AFP, despite being cognizant of H’s status, would not act on the claim, contending that H could not be presumed dead unless a judicial declaration to this effect is issued by the proper court.

In what instance/s is a judicial declaration of presumptive death necessary? In this case, is the contention of the AFP correct? Explain. (3%)

Suggested Answer:

1) For the second question: Under the jurisprudence, a judicial declaration of presumptive death is necessary if the resolution of a controversy relates to the absence of a person which may be presumed dead. This includes re-marriage, succession, among others. A presumption of death cannot be the lone subject of an independent action or proceeding, as the presumption is merely one of the evidence that may be invoked in any action or proceeding.

2) For the second question:

No. Answer

Under jurisprudence, the AFP can decide claims of death benefits of a missing soldier without requiring the claimant to first produce a court declaration of the presumptive death of such soldier. For purposes of succession, a person is presumed dead if his absence has lasted 10 years. Rule

In the case at bar, it is undisputed that W was married to H. Further, H was an AFP member deployed at a rebel-infested area. For over 13 years, H had been missing or absent and despite W’s diligent efforts to ascertain her husband’s whereabouts. Apply

Thus, the AFP’s contention is not correct. Conclusion


(Notice: The suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide, and thus specific citations are not provided. Notwithstanding, in the reviewers, the bar exam question is answered under the appropriate topic which discusses the concepts and principles, as well as provide for specific citations. Accordingly, please refer to it on the reviewer or in the Library.)



Political Law, Labor Law

A. Basic policy on labor

Frequency: ★★☆☆☆ 1. Security of tenure a. Entitlement to security of tenure Workers shall be entitled to security of tenure. (Section 3, Article XIII, 1987

N. Rights of the accused

No person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense without due process of law. (Section 14[1], Article III, 1987 Constitution)

4. Penalties

Frequency: ★★☆☆☆ a. Imposable penalties No felony shall be punishable by any penalty not prescribed by law prior to its commission. (Article 21, Ibid.) 1)

I. Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003

Frequency: ★★★★☆ “Trafficking in Persons” – refers to the recruitment, obtaining, hiring, providing, offering, transportation, transfer, maintaining, harboring, or receipt of persons with or without

E. Crimes against public morals

Frequency: ★★★☆☆ CHAPTER 1: GAMBLING AND BETTING 1. Gambling a. CONCEPT Article 195. What acts are punishable in gambling. – (a) The penalty of arresto

error: Content is protected.