Question 9, 2017 Civil Law Bar Exam

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Lawyer, Author, Mentor


(Question IX, Civil Law, 2017 Bar Exam)

Danny and Elsa were married in 2002. In 2012, Elsa left the conjugal home and her two minor children with Danny to live with her paramour. In 2015, Danny sold without Elsa’s consent a parcel of land registered in his name that he had purchased prior to the marriage. Danny used the proceeds of the sale to pay for his children’s tuition fees.

Is the sale valid, void or voidable? Explain your answer. (3%)

Suggested Answer:

The sale is void. Answer

Under the Family Code, the default property regime is absolute community of property (ACP) whereby all of the assets of the spouses are combined, subject to a few exceptions. Further, in an ACP, without the marital consent of the other spouse, the sale by one spouse of a conjugal property is void. Rule

In the case at bar, Danny and Elsa were married in 2002 and thus covered by the Family Code. Since there is no indication that they have a marriage settlement, the default property regime of absolute community of property applies to them. Hence, the parcel of land became a conjugal property even if it is registered under Danny’s name and purchased prior to the marriage. Accordingly, without the marital consent of Elsa, the sale by Danny of the parcel of land is void. Apply

Thus, the sale is void. Conclusion


(Notice: The suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide, and thus specific citations are not provided. Notwithstanding, in the reviewers, the bar exam question is answered under the appropriate topic which discusses the concepts and principles, as well as provide for specific citations. Accordingly, please refer to it on the reviewer or in the Library.)



Political Law, Labor Law

G. Crimes against persons

Frequency: ★★★★☆ CHAPTER 1: DESTRUCTION OF LIFE SECTION 1 – PARRICIDE, MURDER, HOMICIDE 1. Parricide ELEMENTS: 1) A person is killed; 2) The deceased is

I. Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003

Frequency: ★★★★☆ “Trafficking in Persons” – refers to the recruitment, obtaining, hiring, providing, offering, transportation, transfer, maintaining, harboring, or receipt of persons with or without

4. Retroactive effect of penal laws

Frequency: ★★★★☆ Penal Laws shall have a retroactive effect insofar as they favor the persons guilty of a felony, who is not a habitual criminal,

error: Content is protected.