Question 4, 2018 Labor Law Bar Exam

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Lawyer, Author, Mentor


(Question IV, Labor Law, 2018 Bar Exam)

Natasha Shoe Company adopted an organizational streamlining program that resulted in the retrenchment of 550 employees in its main plant. After having been paid their separation benefits, the retrenched workers demanded payment of retirement benefits under a CBA between their union and management. Natasha Shoe Company denied the workers’ demand.

(a) What is the most procedurally peaceful means to resolve this dispute? (2.5%)

(b) Can the workers claim both separation pay and retirement benefits? (2.5%)

Suggested Answer:


Endorsing the dispute to the grievance machinery is the most procedurally peaceful means to resolve the issue considering Natasha Shoe Company is an organized establishment. If the issue remains unresolved, the dispute may be submitted for voluntary arbitration.

(b) Yes. Answer

Under labor law jurisprudence, employees are entitled to both separation pay and retirement pay unless there is an express stipulation against recovering both, such as in an employment contract, company policy, collective bargaining agreement, or any other employment agreement. Rule

In the case at bar, there is no express stipulation that the workers are prohibited from recovering both separation pay and retirement pay. Apply

Thus, the workers may claim both separation pay and retirement benefits. Conclusion


(Notice: The suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide, and thus specific citations are not provided. Notwithstanding, in the reviewers, the bar exam question is answered under the appropriate topic which discusses the concepts and principles, as well as provide for specific citations. Accordingly, please refer to it on the reviewer or in the Library.)



Political Law, Labor Law

J. Right to Association

The right of the people, including those employed in the public and private sectors, to form unions, associations, or societies for purposes not contrary to

Question 13, 2018 Labor Law Bar Exam

XIII. (Question XIII, Labor Law, 2018 Bar Exam) Nicodemus was employed as a computer programmer by Network Corporation, a telecommunications firm. He has been coming

4. Penalties

Frequency: ★★☆☆☆ a. Imposable penalties No felony shall be punishable by any penalty not prescribed by law prior to its commission. (Article 21, Ibid.) 1)

M. Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002

Frequency: ★★★★☆ 1. Crimes a. Sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery, distribution and transportation of dangerous drugs and/or controlled precursors and essential chemicals 1st Mode 1)

1. Mala in se and mala prohibita

Frequency: ★★★☆☆ Mala in se – refers to acts wrong in themselves. (Dungo v. People, G.R. No. 209464, 01 July 2015) Mala prohibita – refers

1. Criminal liabilities and felonies

Frequency: ★★★★★ FELONIES: Acts and omissions punishable by law are felonies (delitos). (Article 3, Act No. 3815, Revised Penal Code) DOLO; CULPA: Felonies are committed

K. Emancipation

Concept: Emancipation. Emancipation takes place by the attainment of majority. Unless otherwise provided, majority commences at the age of eighteen years.(Article 234, Family Code, as

Question 5, 2018 Civil Law Bar Exam

V (Question V, Civil Law, 2018 Bar Exam) Sol Soldivino, widow, passed away, leaving two (2) legitimate children: a 25-year-old son, Santino (whom she had

error: Content is protected.