Question 4, 2017 Labor Law Bar Exam

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Lawyer, Author, Mentor

IV.

(Question IV, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam)

The Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board (RTWPB) for Region 3 issued a wage order on November 2, 2017 fixing the minimum wages for all industries throughout Region 3.

(a) Is the wage order subject to the approval of the National Wages and Productivity Commission before it takes effect? (2%)

(b) The law mandates that no petition for wage increase shall be entertained within a period of 12 months from the effectivity of the wage order. Under what circumstances may the Kilusang Walang Takot, a federation of labor organizations that publicly and openly assails the wage order as blatantly unjust, initiate the review of the wage increases under the wage order without waiting for the end of the 12-month period? Explain your answer. (3%)

Suggested Answer:

(a) No. Under the Labor Code, the Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board (RTWPB) has the authority and power to issue wage orders and such are not subject to approval of the National Wages and Productivity Commission (NWPC). Once the wage order is published, it takes effect after 15 days without any other condition.

(b) The 12-month period is subject to the exception of when there is a supervening condition, such as an extraordinary increase in prices of petroleum products and basic goods and services. In such a circumstance, the federation may file a petition for review.

..

(Notice: The suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide, and thus specific citations are not provided. Notwithstanding, in the reviewers, the bar exam question is answered under the appropriate topic which discusses the concepts and principles, as well as provide for specific citations. Accordingly, please refer to it on the reviewer or in the Library.)

Share:

WhatsApp
Telegram
Facebook
Twitter
Subjects

Political Law, Labor Law

Question 6, 2017 Labor Law Bar Exam

VI. (Question VI, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam) A. One of Pacific Airline’s policies was to hire only single applicants as flight attendants, and considered

I. Eminent Domain

Frequency: ★★★☆☆ 1. Concept Concept: Eminent domain. Eminent domain – is the power of the State to take private property for public use. It is

H. Anti-Torture Act of 2009

Frequency: ★★★☆☆ “Torture” – refers to an act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for

G. Anti-Plunder Act

Frequency: ★★★★★ “Public Officer” – means any person holding any public office in the Government of the Republic of the Philippines by virtue of an

7. Civil liability in criminal cases

Frequency: ★★★☆☆ a. Civil liability of certain persons Every person criminally liable for a felony is also civilly liable. (Article 100, Ibid.) 1) Rules regarding

M. Quasi-offenses

Frequency: ★★★★★ 1. Imprudence and negligence a. Reckless imprudence RECKLESS IMPRUDENCE: Reckless imprudence consists in voluntary, but without malice, doing or falling to do an

N. Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012

Frequency: ★★★★☆ “Access” – refers to the instruction, communication with, storing data in, retrieving data from, or otherwise making use of any resources of a

Question 4, 2017 Civil Law Bar Exam

IV. (Question IV, Civil Law, 2017 Bar Exam) (a) Distinguish antichresis from usufruct? (3%) (b) Distinguish commodatum from mutuum. (3%) Suggested Answer: (a) By the

error: Content is protected.