Question 10, 2018 Political Law Bar Exam

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Lawyer, Author, Mentor


(Question X, Political Law, 2018 Bar Exam)

Ascertain the constitutionality of the following acts: (2.5% each)

(a) An investigation conducted by the Ombudsman against a Commissioner of the Commission on Audit for serious misconduct.

(b) A law prohibiting any court, other than the Supreme Court, from issuing a writ of injunction against an investigation being conducted by the Ombudsman.

(c) A law prohibiting any appeal from the decision or final order of the Ombudsman in an administrative proceeding, except through a petition for review on certiorari filed before the Supreme Court.

Suggested Answer:

(a) It is constitutional. While the Commissioner of the Commission on Audit may only be removed by impeachment, the Ombudsman retains the power to investigate any serious misconduct in office allegedly committed by officials removable by impeachment, for the purpose of filing a verified complaint for impeachment, if warranted.

(b) It is unconstitutional. Under jurisprudence, the Supreme Court, under its sole prerogative and authority over all matters of procedure, deemed it proper to declare as ineffective the prohibition against courts other than the Supreme Court from issuing provisional injunctive writs to enjoin investigations conducted by the Office of the Ombudsman.

(c) It is unconstitutional if the law was passed without the advice and concurrence of the Supreme Court. Under the 1987 Constitution, no law shall be passed increasing the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court as provided in this Constitution without its advice and concurrence.


(Notice: The suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide, and thus specific citations are not provided. Notwithstanding, in the reviewers, the bar exam question is answered under the appropriate topic which discusses the concepts and principles, as well as provide for specific citations. Accordingly, please refer to it on the reviewer or in the Library.)



Political Law, Labor Law

Question 4, 2018 Labor Law Bar Exam

IV. (Question IV, Labor Law, 2018 Bar Exam) Natasha Shoe Company adopted an organizational streamlining program that resulted in the retrenchment of 550 employees in

H. Right to information

Frequency: ★★☆☆☆ 1. Scope and limitations a. Scope Concept: Right to information. The right of the people to information on matters of public concern shall

E. Freedom of speech and expression

Frequency: ★★☆☆☆ 1. Political speech Concept: Freedom of expression. Freedom of expression is the freedom to disseminate ideas and beliefs, whether competing, conforming or otherwise.

F. Crimes committed by public officers

Frequency: ★★★★★ CHAPTER 1: PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS a. CONCEPT OF PUBLIC OFFICERS PUBLIC OFFICERS: For the purpose of applying the provisions of this and the preceding

C. Crimes against public order

Frequency: ★★★☆☆ CHAPTER 1: REBELLION, SEDITION AND DISLOYALTY 1. Rebellion or insurrection a. CONCEPT Article 134. Rebellion or insurrection; How committed. – The crime of

4. Penalties

Frequency: ★★☆☆☆ a. Imposable penalties No felony shall be punishable by any penalty not prescribed by law prior to its commission. (Article 21, Ibid.) 1)

J. Crimes against chastity

Frequency: ★★★★★ COMMON PROVISIONS 1) Prosecution of the crimes of adultery, concubinage, seduction, abduction, rape and acts of lasciviousness The crimes of adultery and concubinage

L. Retroactivity of the Family Code

Concept: Retroactivity. This Code shall have retroactive effect insofar as it does not prejudice or impair vested or acquired rights in accordance with the Civil

I. Support

1. WHAT IT COMPRISES Support comprises everything indispensable for sustenance, dwelling, clothing, medical attendance, education and transportation, in keeping with the financial capacity of the

error: Content is protected.