C. Burden of proof and quantum of evidence in labor cases

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Atty. Jericho Del Puerto

Lawyer, Author, Mentor

Frequency: ★★★★☆

1. Shifts between employer and employee depending on circumstances

Notably, in determining the employee’s entitlement to monetary claims, the burden of proof is shifted from the employer or the employee, depending on the monetary claim sought. (Minsola v. New City Builders, Inc., G.R. No. 207613, 31 January 2018)

a. When on employer

In claims for payment of salary differential, service incentive leave, holiday pay and 13th month pay, the burden rests on the employer to prove payment. This likewise stems from the fact that all pertinent personnel files, payrolls, records, remittances and other similar documents – which will show that the differentials, service incentive leave and other claims of workers have been paid – are not in the possession of the worker but are in the custody and control of the employer. (Ibid.)

b. When on employee

On the other hand, for overtime pay, premium pays for holidays and rest days, the burden is shifted on the employee, as these monetary claims are not incurred in the normal course of business. It is thus incumbent upon the employee to first prove that he actually rendered service in excess of the regular eight working hours a day, and that he in fact worked on holidays and rest days. (Ibid.)

BAR EXAM TIPS
1) The burden of proof is not always with the employer.
2) When it comes to amounts regularly or usually received by the employee (e.g. salary, holiday pay, etc.) or should be received (e.g. 13th month pay, etc.), it is the employer’s burden of proof to show payment.
3) However, when it comes to those that are not regularly or usually received by the employees such as overtime pay (employees do not receive them by default unless they are directed to do overtime work), it is the employee’s burden of proof to show that he is entitled thereto.

Share:

WhatsApp
Telegram
Facebook
Twitter
Subjects

Political Law, Labor Law

Question 9, 2017 Labor Law Bar Exam

IX. (Question IX, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam) Section 255 (245) of the Labor Code recognizes three categories of employees, namely: managerial, supervisory, and rank-and-file.

M. Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002

Frequency: ★★★★☆ 1. Crimes a. Sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery, distribution and transportation of dangerous drugs and/or controlled precursors and essential chemicals 1st Mode 1)

1. Criminal liabilities and felonies

Frequency: ★★★★★ FELONIES: Acts and omissions punishable by law are felonies (delitos). (Article 3, Act No. 3815, Revised Penal Code) DOLO; CULPA: Felonies are committed

I. Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003

Frequency: ★★★★☆ “Trafficking in Persons” – refers to the recruitment, obtaining, hiring, providing, offering, transportation, transfer, maintaining, harboring, or receipt of persons with or without

G. Crimes against persons

Frequency: ★★★★☆ CHAPTER 1: DESTRUCTION OF LIFE SECTION 1 – PARRICIDE, MURDER, HOMICIDE 1. Parricide ELEMENTS: 1) A person is killed; 2) The deceased is

K. Emancipation

Concept: Emancipation. Emancipation takes place by the attainment of majority. Unless otherwise provided, majority commences at the age of eighteen years.(Article 234, Family Code, as

error: Content is protected.